Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.

Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.

93 Ohio St. 3d 1268
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 Ohio St. 3d 115 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 26, 2001·No. 00-428·Published

Opinion

Certified State Law Question, No. 98CV7578. Reported at 92 Ohio St.3d 115, 748 N.E.2d 1111. On motion for reconsideration of Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co., 93 Ohio St. 3d 1268 (Ohio 2001).

93 Ohio St. 3d 1268 (Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.
748 N.E.2d 1111 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)