Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.

735 N.E.2d 899, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1421, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2320
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 22, 2000
Docket00-428
StatusPublished

This text of 735 N.E.2d 899 (Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co., 735 N.E.2d 899, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1421, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2320 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Certified State Law Question, No. 98CV7578. This cause came before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers, to participate in oral argument scheduled for October 10, 2000,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to petitioners.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
735 N.E.2d 899, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1421, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holeton-v-crouse-cartage-co-ohio-2000.