Holcomb v. State

2013 Ohio 2414
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holcomb v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 Ohio St. 3d 82
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 2013·No. 2013-0108·Published

Opinion

[Cite as Holcomb v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 82, 2013-Ohio-2414.]

HOLCOMB, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as Holcomb v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 82, 2013-Ohio-2414.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Dunbar v. State. (No. 2013-0108—Submitted June 5, 2013—Decided June 13, 2013.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 26235, 2012-Ohio-5869. ____________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Dunbar v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 181, 2013-Ohio-2163, 992 N.E.2d 1111. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. ____________________ Kirk A. Migdal, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, Alexandra T. Schimmer, Solicitor General, and Peter K. Glenn-Applegate, Deputy Solicitor; and Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lesley A. Walter, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. ________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holcomb v. State, 2013 Ohio 2414 (Ohio 2013).

2013 Ohio 2414 (Holcomb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunbar v. State
2013 Ohio 2163 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
Holcomb v. State
2012 Ohio 5869 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
Holcomb v. State
990 N.E.2d 589 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)