Holcomb v. State
This text of 2013 Ohio 2414 (Holcomb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Holcomb v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 82, 2013-Ohio-2414.]
HOLCOMB, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as Holcomb v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 82, 2013-Ohio-2414.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Dunbar v. State. (No. 2013-0108—Submitted June 5, 2013—Decided June 13, 2013.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 26235, 2012-Ohio-5869. ____________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Dunbar v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 181, 2013-Ohio-2163, 992 N.E.2d 1111. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. ____________________ Kirk A. Migdal, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, Alexandra T. Schimmer, Solicitor General, and Peter K. Glenn-Applegate, Deputy Solicitor; and Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lesley A. Walter, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. ________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ohio 2414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holcomb-v-state-ohio-2013.