Holbach v. State
Opinion
Filed 11/9/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 205
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Daniel Raymond Szklarski, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20100087
Appeal from the District Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard M Geiger, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Barbara L. Whelan, State’s Attorney, Walsh County Courthouse, 600 Cooper Ave., 3rd Floor, Grafton, N.D. 58237, for plaintiff and appellee.
Darla J. Schuman, Schuman Law Office, 3001-A 32nd Ave. S., Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Szklarski
[¶1] Daniel Szklarski appeals from the trial court’s judgment and order revoking his probation. On appeal, Szklarski argues the trial court erred in allowing him to represent himself at the probation revocation hearing because he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2010 ND 209 (Holbach v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.