Holbach v. State
This text of 2011 ND 181 (Holbach v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 9/15/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2011 ND 177
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Keith Edward Johnson, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
No. 20110011
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Lloyd C. Suhr (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, plaintiff and appellee.
Carey A. Goetz (on brief), P.O. Box 1874, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1874, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Johnson
[¶1] Keith Johnson appeals from a district court judgment following a jury verdict convicting him of disobedience of a judicial order for failing to appear on time to serve his four-day sentence for driving under suspension. Johnson argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 ND 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holbach-v-state-nd-2011.