Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc.

369 U.S. 659, 82 S. Ct. 1035, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1274
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 11, 1962·No. 227 M·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

369 U.S. 659 (1962)

HOHENSEE
v.
NEWS SYNDICATE, INC.

No. 214.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 14, 1962.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.

James C. Newton for petitioner.

Stuart N. Updike for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc., 369 U.S. 659, 82 S. Ct. 1035, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1274 (1962).

369 U.S. 659 (Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carroll Porter Lillian Porter v. Robert L. Groat
840 F.2d 255 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)
Mulcahy v. Guertler
416 F. Supp. 1083 (D. Massachusetts, 1976)
Robinson v. Carroll
318 F. Supp. 527 (M.D. North Carolina, 1970)
Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc.
369 U.S. 659 (Supreme Court, 1962)