Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc.
This text of 369 U.S. 659 (Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
HOHENSEE
v.
NEWS SYNDICATE, INC.
Supreme Court of United States.
James C. Newton for petitioner.
Stuart N. Updike for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
369 U.S. 659, 82 S. Ct. 1035, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hohensee-v-news-syndicate-inc-scotus-1962.