Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc.
369 U.S. 659, 82 S. Ct. 1035, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1274
Opinion
HOHENSEE
v.
NEWS SYNDICATE, INC.
Supreme Court of United States.
James C. Newton for petitioner.
Stuart N. Updike for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc., 369 U.S. 659, 82 S. Ct. 1035, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1274 (1962).
369 U.S. 659 (Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carroll Porter Lillian Porter v. Robert L. Groat
840 F.2d 255 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)
Mulcahy v. Guertler
416 F. Supp. 1083 (D. Massachusetts, 1976)
Robinson v. Carroll
318 F. Supp. 527 (M.D. North Carolina, 1970)
Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc.
369 U.S. 659 (Supreme Court, 1962)