Hoffman v. State

928 So. 2d 382, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3237, 2006 WL 547957
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoffman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 997 So. 2d 1230
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2006·No. No. 3D05-1469·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion of defendant-appellant Eric M. Hoffman to modify the terms of his probation so as to transfer his supervision from Monroe County to Broward County. As the trial court correctly concluded, the defendant must exhaust his administrative remedies by applying to the Florida Department of Corrections for transfer of supervision. See Henderson v. Crosby, [383]*383891 So.2d 1180, 1182 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Hidalgo v. State, 729 So.2d 984, 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Sutton v. Strickland, 485 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoffman v. State, 928 So. 2d 382, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3237, 2006 WL 547957 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

928 So. 2d 382 (Hoffman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hidalgo v. State
729 So. 2d 984 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Sutton v. Strickland
485 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Henderson v. Crosby
891 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)