Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hoffman v. State

Hoffman v. State

928 So. 2d 382, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3237, 2006 WL 547957
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 2006
DocketNo. 3D05-1469
StatusPublished

This text of 928 So. 2d 382 (Hoffman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoffman v. State, 928 So. 2d 382, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3237, 2006 WL 547957 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion of defendant-appellant Eric M. Hoffman to modify the terms of his probation so as to transfer his supervision from Monroe County to Broward County. As the trial court correctly concluded, the defendant must exhaust his administrative remedies by applying to the Florida Department of Corrections for transfer of supervision. See Henderson v. Crosby, [383]*383891 So.2d 1180, 1182 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Hidalgo v. State, 729 So.2d 984, 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Sutton v. Strickland, 485 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hidalgo v. State
729 So. 2d 984 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Sutton v. Strickland
485 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Henderson v. Crosby
891 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
928 So. 2d 382, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3237, 2006 WL 547957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.