Hoff v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 10, 2010·No. 10-1171·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1171

ROBERT HOFF,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER C. DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cv-02138-TLW)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 10, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Hoff, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Hoff appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Hoff v. Davis, No. 4:06-

cv-02138-TLW (D.S.C. filed Jan. 6, 2009 & entered Jan. 7, 2009;

Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoff v. Davis, (4th Cir. 2010).

Hoff v. Davis (Hoff v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related