Hoff v. Davis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1171
ROBERT HOFF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER C. DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cv-02138-TLW)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 10, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Hoff, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Robert Hoff appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hoff v. Davis, No. 4:06-
cv-02138-TLW (D.S.C. filed Jan. 6, 2009 & entered Jan. 7, 2009;
Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoff v. Davis (Hoff v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.