Hoff v. Davis

Fourth Circuit

Hoff v. Davis

382 F. App'x 322

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 10, 2010·No. No. 10-1171·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Hoff appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoff v. Davis, No. 4:06-cv-02138-TLW (D.S.C. filed Jan. 6, 2009 & entered Jan. 7, 2009); 2010 WL 234907 (Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Hoff appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoff v. Davis, No. 4:06-cv-02138-TLW (D.S.C. filed Jan. 6, 2009 & entered Jan. 7, 2009); 2010 WL 234907 (Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hoff v. Davis, 382 F. App'x 322 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

382 F. App'x 322 (Hoff v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related