Hoerger v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoerger v. Board of Education

215 A.D.2d 727, 627 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5676

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 727 (Hoerger v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoerger v. Board of Education, 215 A.D.2d 727, 627 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, the defendant Great Neck Teachers Association, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated January 22, 1992, as granted the motion of the defendant Board of Education of the [728]*728Great Neck Union Free School District, made at the close of evidence, to dismiss its cross claims for contribution or indemnification.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements.

This appeal is academic in light of this Court’s decision and order in a related appeal (see, Hoerger v Board of Educ., 215 AD2d 728 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, the defendant Great Neck Teachers Association, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated January 22, 1992, as granted the motion of the defendant Board of Education of the [728]*728Great Neck Union Free School District, made at the close of evidence, to dismiss its cross claims for contribution or indemnification.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements.

This appeal is academic in light of this Court’s decision and order in a related appeal (see, Hoerger v Board of Educ., 215 AD2d 728 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 727, 627 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoerger-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack