Hoeflschweiger v. Decovnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoeflschweiger v. Decovnick

287 A.D.2d 694, 732 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 287 A.D.2d 694 (Hoeflschweiger v. Decovnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoeflschweiger v. Decovnick, 287 A.D.2d 694, 732 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated August 23, 2000, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), dated December 15, 2000, which denied his motion to resettle the judgment.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Celauro v Celauro, 286 AD2d 471; EQK Green Acres v United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 248 AD2d 667; Foertsch v Foertsch, 187 AD2d 635; Schanback v Schanback, 159 AD2d 498, 500). O’Brien, J. P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated August 23, 2000, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), dated December 15, 2000, which denied his motion to resettle the judgment.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Celauro v Celauro, 286 AD2d 471; EQK Green Acres v United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 248 AD2d 667; Foertsch v Foertsch, 187 AD2d 635; Schanback v Schanback, 159 AD2d 498, 500). O’Brien, J. P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 A.D.2d 694, 732 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoeflschweiger-v-decovnick-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack