Hoeflschweiger v. Decovnick

287 A.D.2d 694, 732 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated August 23, 2000, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), dated December 15, 2000, which denied his motion to resettle the judgment.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Celauro v Celauro, 286 AD2d 471; EQK Green Acres v United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 248 AD2d 667; Foertsch v Foertsch, 187 AD2d 635; Schanback v Schanback, 159 AD2d 498, 500). O’Brien, J. P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoeflschweiger v. Decovnick, 287 A.D.2d 694, 732 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

287 A.D.2d 694 (Hoeflschweiger v. Decovnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradley v. William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.
2022 NY Slip Op 00165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Vogelgesang v. Vogelgesang
71 A.D.3d 1131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Cohen v. Gordon
297 A.D.2d 272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)