Celauro v. Celauro
This text of 286 A.D.2d 471 (Celauro v. Celauro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered June 20, 2000, which denied his motion to resettle a judgment of the same court, dated May 10, 2000.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Schanback v Schanback, 159 AD2d 498, 500; Blaustein v Blaustein, 145 AD2d 591; Blume v Blume, 124 AD2d 771). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D.2d 471, 729 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/celauro-v-celauro-nyappdiv-2001.