Celauro v. Celauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Celauro v. Celauro

286 A.D.2d 471, 729 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8275

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 27, 2001·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered June 20, 2000, which denied his motion to resettle a judgment of the same court, dated May 10, 2000.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Schanback v Schanback, 159 AD2d 498, 500; Blaustein v Blaustein, 145 AD2d 591; Blume v Blume, 124 AD2d 771). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered June 20, 2000, which denied his motion to resettle a judgment of the same court, dated May 10, 2000.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Schanback v Schanback, 159 AD2d 498, 500; Blaustein v Blaustein, 145 AD2d 591; Blume v Blume, 124 AD2d 771). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Celauro v. Celauro, 286 A.D.2d 471, 729 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

286 A.D.2d 471 (Celauro v. Celauro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related