Hoefers v. Jones

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Hoefers v. Jones

672 A.2d 1177, 288 N.J. Super. 478

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedMarch 8, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 672 A.2d 1177 (Hoefers v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoefers v. Jones, 672 A.2d 1177, 288 N.J. Super. 478 (N.J. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

288 N.J. Super. 478 (1996) 672 A.2d 1177

JANET LYNN HOEFERS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM H. JONES, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted February 21, 1996. Decided March 8, 1996.

Before Judges PRESSLER, KEEFE and WEFING.

Louis D. Fletcher, attorney for appellant (Mr. Fletcher, of counsel; Michael R. Contarino, on the brief).

Ulrichsen, Amarel & Eory, attorneys for respondent (John S. Eory, on the brief).

*479 PER CURIAM.

The orders of the Chancery Division, Family Part, are affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Herman's opinion decided April 29, 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

288 N.J. Super. 478 (1996) 672 A.2d 1177

JANET LYNN HOEFERS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM H. JONES, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted February 21, 1996. Decided March 8, 1996.

Before Judges PRESSLER, KEEFE and WEFING.

Louis D. Fletcher, attorney for appellant (Mr. Fletcher, of counsel; Michael R. Contarino, on the brief).

Ulrichsen, Amarel & Eory, attorneys for respondent (John S. Eory, on the brief).

*479 PER CURIAM.

The orders of the Chancery Division, Family Part, are affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Herman's opinion decided April 29, 1994.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

672 A.2d 1177, 288 N.J. Super. 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoefers-v-jones-njsuperctappdiv-1996.

Opinion

JANET LYNN HOEFERS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM H. JONES, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

JANET LYNN HOEFERS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM H. JONES, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.