Hodgson v. William Len Hotel Co.

436 F.2d 1083, 19 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 844
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 1971
DocketNos. 20441, 20442
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 436 F.2d 1083 (Hodgson v. William Len Hotel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodgson v. William Len Hotel Co., 436 F.2d 1083, 19 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 844 (6th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These appeals arise out of an action by the Secretary of Labor to enforce certain of the minimum wages provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, [1084]*108429 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.', in order to force the William Len Hotel Company to pay its tipped employees higher wages. After a trial, the District Court found that the Hotel was paying its day-shift bellmen too little, but refused to enjoin the Company from future violations, and refused to order restitution of back pay, on the grounds that: the Hotel did not have a history of Fair Labor Standards Act violations; the proof of wages wrongfully withheld was inadequate; it would be inequitable to issue an injunction. The District Court did enjoin the Hotel to keep regular records on how much its bellmen received in tips. The Secretary appeals; the Hotel cross appeals.

Upon a review of the record in its entirety, we are of the opinion that the ■District Court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and its conclusions in accordance with the law. Its refusals to grant restitution for the tipped employees and to grant a permanent injunction against future violations are supported by facts, circumstances, and equities sufficient to indicate proper exercise of discretion. See Shultz v. Mistleto Express Service, Inc., 434 F.2d 1267 (10th Cir., filed December 8, 1970).

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Each party to pay its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 F.2d 1083, 19 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodgson-v-william-len-hotel-co-ca6-1971.