Hodges v. Hodges
771 S.W.2d 741, 298 Ark. 550, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 196
Opinion
We deny the petitioner’s request for a writ of prohibition, but we do so because the record and orders presented to us are unclear. In denying such relief, we in no way intend to give validity to the standing master order entered below, but assume that any issue addressing that point would be presented to us along with any other in any appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hodges v. Hodges, 771 S.W.2d 741, 298 Ark. 550, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 196 (Ark. 1989).
771 S.W.2d 741 (Hodges v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meyer v. CDI CONTRACTORS, LLC
284 S.W.3d 530 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2008)
Cooper Realty Investments Inc. v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board
134 S.W.3d 1 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2003)
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 1999
Beasley v. Graves
869 S.W.2d 20 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Wilcox v. Safley
766 S.W.2d 12 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1989)