Hodges v. City of New York
This text of 22 A.D.3d 525 (Hodges v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated March 4, 2004, which denied her motion to strike the defense of the statute of limitations, granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
Our determination of an appeal in a related action (see Hodges v City of New York, 22 AD3d 525 [2005] [decided herewith]) renders this appeal academic. Adams, J.P., Mastro, Lifson and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A.D.3d 525, 801 N.Y.S.2d 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodges-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2005.