Hodecker v. Hodecker

20 Misc. 641, 46 N.Y.S. 1073
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Misc. 641 (Hodecker v. Hodecker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hodecker v. Hodecker, 20 Misc. 641, 46 N.Y.S. 1073 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Opinion

Dunwell, J.

The amended complaint demurred to cannot be fairly said to state more than one cause of action, viz., for separation. The allegations in respect to defendant’s deceitful conduct in obtaining a release of plaintiff’s right of dower in defendant’s real property may be considered as of some materiality in interpreting his other alleged improper conduct towards the plaintiff.

In a complaint for separation it is common practice to ask for a pecuniary provision to be made for the wife. The allegation in respect to dower and prayer for an injunction may not be altogether inappropriate in connection with these features of the case. Casey v. Casey, 2 Barb. 59; Vermilyea v. Vermilyea, 14 Hun, 471.

The demurrer must be overruled, with costs of demurrer to plaintiff, with leave to defendant to serve an answer to the amended complaint within twenty days from service of the judgment overruling the demurrer and upon payment of the costs of demurrer.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodecker v. Hodecker
50 N.Y.S. 1128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Misc. 641, 46 N.Y.S. 1073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hodecker-v-hodecker-nysupct-1897.