Casey v. Casey
This text of 2 Barb. 59 (Casey v. Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A plaintiff may state in his bill any matter of evidence, or any collateral fact, the admission of which, by the defendant, may be material in establishing the general allegations of the bill as a pleading, or in ascertaining or determining the nature, extent, or kind of relief to which the plaintiff may be entitled; or which may legally influence the court in determining the question of costs. And where the averment in the bill may, if admitted by the defendant, or established by proof, thus affect the decision of the cause, it is relevant, and cannot be excepted to as impertinent.
The averment here excepted to may affect the decision of the court, not only as to alimony, part of the relief prayed for, and as to the costs, but also as corroborative of the principal charge of adultery. It cannot, therefore, be impertinent; and the exception is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Barb. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-casey-nysupct-1847.