Hobson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hobson v. State

320 S.W.3d 724, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1250, 2010 WL 3637536

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hobson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 671 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2010·No. ED 93736·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Maurice J. Hobson (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment denying Movant’s motion for post-conviction relief and request for an evidentiary hearing, filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Maurice J. Hobson (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment denying Movant’s motion for post-conviction relief and request for an evidentiary hearing, filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hobson v. State, 320 S.W.3d 724, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1250, 2010 WL 3637536 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

320 S.W.3d 724 (Hobson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.