Hobbs v. State

352 S.W.2d 836, 171 Tex. Crim. 607, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1138
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 10, 1962·No. 34080·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

McDonald, judge.

The offense is felony theft; the punishment, enhanced under Article 63, Vernon’s *837 Ann.P.C., by three prior convictions for felonies less than capital, life imprisonment.

The State has confessed error in this case. We agree that the cause must be reversed.

In the absence of any evidence to support the allegation that each succeeding offense was committed after the judgment of conviction had become final in each prior conviction alleged for enhancement, the evidence is insufficient to sustain this conviction. Rogers v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 333 S.W.2d 383; Guilliams v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 81, 261 S.W.2d 598; also see (first Rogers case) Rogers v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 325 S.W.2d 697.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hobbs v. State, 352 S.W.2d 836, 171 Tex. Crim. 607, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1138 (Tex. 1962).

352 S.W.2d 836 (Hobbs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheat v. State
442 S.W.2d 363 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Andrews v. State
407 S.W.2d 507 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Haines v. State
391 S.W.2d 58 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)