Guilliams v. State

261 S.W.2d 598, 159 Tex. Crim. 81, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1784
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 21, 1953
Docket26499
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 261 S.W.2d 598 (Guilliams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guilliams v. State, 261 S.W.2d 598, 159 Tex. Crim. 81, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1784 (Tex. 1953).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction under the so-called habitual criminal statute, Art. 63, P. C., which provides that a third conviction for an ordinary felony carry a punishment of life in the penitentiary.

*82 The instant indictment does not allege that the second prior conviction relied upon was for an offense committed subsequent to the first prior conviction alleged.

The absence of such allegation is fatal to this conviction, for, to invoke the provisions of Art. 63, P. C., it is necessary that each succeeding conviction be subsequent to the previous conviction both in point of time of the commission of the offense and , the conviction therefor. Gammill v. State, 135 Tex. Cr. R. 52, 117 S. W. 2d 790; Childress v. State, 134 Tex. Cr. R. 504, 116 S. W. 2d 396; Mullins v. State, 140 Tex. Cr. R. 261, 144 S. W. 2d 565; Square v. State, 142 Tex. Cr. R. 493, 154 S. W. 2d 852; Harrison v. State, 145 Tex. Cr. R. 386, 168 S. W. 2d 243.

The state’s attorney before this court confesses that the indictment is insufficient in the particular pointed out.

For the error discussed, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sonny Thomas Griffith v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013
Gutierrez v. State
555 S.W.2d 457 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
McClain v. State
505 S.W.2d 825 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Linley v. State
501 S.W.2d 121 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Cooper v. State
500 S.W.2d 837 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Dora v. State
477 S.W.2d 20 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Alvarez v. State
472 S.W.2d 762 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Villareal v. State
468 S.W.2d 837 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Jackson v. State
449 S.W.2d 279 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Wheat v. State
442 S.W.2d 363 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Andrews v. State
407 S.W.2d 507 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
McDonald v. State
379 S.W.2d 349 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Cowan v. State
355 S.W.2d 521 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Hobbs v. State
352 S.W.2d 836 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Rogers v. State
325 S.W.2d 697 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Martin v. State
297 S.W.2d 166 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Armendariz v. State
294 S.W.2d 98 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 S.W.2d 598, 159 Tex. Crim. 81, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guilliams-v-state-texcrimapp-1953.