Hobbs v. State
This text of 2013 Ark. App. 567 (Hobbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 567
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-12-1133
Opinion Delivered October 9, 2013
CARLTON HOBBS APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT [NO. CR-2009-67] V. HONORABLE DAVID G. HENRY, JUDGE
STATE OF ARKANSAS AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPELLEE WITHDRAW GRANTED
BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge
Carlton Hobbs was found guilty by a jury of one count of second-degree battery, for
which he received a sentence of six years’ imprisonment. Hobbs’s attorney has filed a
no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-
3(k) (2012), along with a motion to be relieved as counsel, asserting that there is no issue of
arguable merit for an appeal. Hobbs was notified, by certified mail, of his right to file pro se
points for reversal but has not done so. The State has not filed a brief.
The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but
rather would an appeal be wholly frivolous. Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885 S.W.2d 904
(1994). Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders and the
requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that Hobbs’s appeal is wholly without merit.
Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 567
700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this memorandum opinion granting counsel’s motion to be
relieved and affirming the court’s judgment.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
WYNNE and BROWN, JJ., agree.
Brett D. Watson, Attorney at Law, PLLC, by: Brett D. Watson, for appellant.
No response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ark. App. 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-state-arkctapp-2013.