Hobbs v. State

2013 Ark. App. 567
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 9, 2013
DocketCR-12-1133
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2013 Ark. App. 567 (Hobbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobbs v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 567 (Ark. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 567

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-12-1133

Opinion Delivered October 9, 2013

CARLTON HOBBS APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT [NO. CR-2009-67] V. HONORABLE DAVID G. HENRY, JUDGE

STATE OF ARKANSAS AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPELLEE WITHDRAW GRANTED

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge

Carlton Hobbs was found guilty by a jury of one count of second-degree battery, for

which he received a sentence of six years’ imprisonment. Hobbs’s attorney has filed a

no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-

3(k) (2012), along with a motion to be relieved as counsel, asserting that there is no issue of

arguable merit for an appeal. Hobbs was notified, by certified mail, of his right to file pro se

points for reversal but has not done so. The State has not filed a brief.

The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but

rather would an appeal be wholly frivolous. Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885 S.W.2d 904

(1994). Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders and the

requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that Hobbs’s appeal is wholly without merit.

Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 567

700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this memorandum opinion granting counsel’s motion to be

relieved and affirming the court’s judgment.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

WYNNE and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Brett D. Watson, Attorney at Law, PLLC, by: Brett D. Watson, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hobbs v. State
2013 Ark. App. 567 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2013 Ark. App. 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-state-arkctapp-2013.