Home/New York Court of Appeals/Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy

Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy

453 N.E.2d 1245, 59 N.Y.2d 1012, 466 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3281
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 7, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 453 N.E.2d 1245 (Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy, 453 N.E.2d 1245, 59 N.Y.2d 1012, 466 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3281 (N.Y. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. On this record, it cannot be said that the commissioner’s determination that the landlord had failed to prove continuous owner occupancy for a period of one year (Administrative Code of City of New York, § Y51-3.0, subd e, par 2, cl [i], subcl [3]; New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations, § 2, subd f, par [11]) lacks a rational basis.

[1014]*1014Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy
455 N.E.2d 665 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 N.E.2d 1245, 59 N.Y.2d 1012, 466 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoan-holding-co-v-joy-ny-1983.