Hitchcock v. Hitchcock
This text of 967 So. 2d 422 (Hitchcock v. Hitchcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Douglas Wayne HITCHCOCK, Appellant,
v.
Lisa Ann HITCHCOCK, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Tara S. Rosenblum, Quincy, and Scott T. Manion and Gigi Rollini, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant brought this appeal seeking review of an Order, entered on March 27, 2007, and an Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration, entered on April 5, 2007, that denied the appellant's motions to review and reconsider the proposed payment plan established by the Clerk of Circuit Court pursuant to Sections 57.082(5) and 28.246(4), Florida Statutes. Because these are not final orders or appealable nonfinal orders pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See generally Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissing appeal of order denying request to proceed as indigent and holding that order is not reviewable by petition for writ of certiorari); Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (dismissing appeal of interlocutory order granting indigency status and imposing a lien on a prisoner's trust account for payment of court costs and fees). The appellant's motion to consolidate, filed on July 26, 2007, is denied as moot.
ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
967 So. 2d 422, 2007 WL 3144853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hitchcock-v-hitchcock-fladistctapp-2007.