Crossland v. Marcobay Construction, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crossland v. Marcobay Construction, Inc.

967 So. 2d 422, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17212, 2007 WL 3144862

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 30, 2007

DocketNo. 1D07-4567

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 967 So. 2d 422 (Crossland v. Marcobay Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crossland v. Marcobay Construction, Inc., 967 So. 2d 422, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17212, 2007 WL 3144862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 24, 2007, the Court has determined that it [423]*423lacks jurisdiction to review the order on appeal. The appellant has sought review of an Order on Defendants Drew Brady and Stephen Cowperthwaite’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment. However, because the order merely grants a motion for summai’y judgment and fails to actually enter judgment, it is not a final appealable order. See Hickox v. Taylor, 933 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 24, 2007, the Court has determined that it [423]*423lacks jurisdiction to review the order on appeal. The appellant has sought review of an Order on Defendants Drew Brady and Stephen Cowperthwaite’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment. However, because the order merely grants a motion for summai’y judgment and fails to actually enter judgment, it is not a final appealable order. See Hickox v. Taylor, 933 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

967 So. 2d 422, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17212, 2007 WL 3144862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crossland-v-marcobay-construction-inc-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack