Hinz v. Almy
774 N.W.2d 688
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hinz v. Almy. Read the opinion of the Court — 778 N.W.2d 228 →
Opinion
Joseph HINZ, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Allen Hawkins, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Alan ALMY, Defendant-Appellee, and
Alexander Hamil, Defendant.
Joseph Hinz, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Allen Hawkins, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michigan State University Board of Trustees, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinz v. Almy, 774 N.W.2d 688 (Mich. 2009).
774 N.W.2d 688 (Hinz v. Almy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.