Hinz v. Almy
778 N.W.2d 228
This text of 778 N.W.2d 228 (Hinz v. Almy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hinz v. Almy, 778 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. 2010).
Opinion
Joseph HINZ, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Allen Hawkins, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Alan ALMY, Defendant-Appellee, and
Alexander Hamil, Defendant.
Joseph Hinz, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Allen Hawkins, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michigan State University Board of Trustees, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's November 19, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Young
778 N.W.2d 228 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
778 N.W.2d 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinz-v-almy-mich-2010.