Hinton v. State
252 S.W. 525, 95 Tex. Crim. 3, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 487
Opinions
— Appellant was convicted in the District Court Wichita County of receiving and concealing stolen property, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a statement of facts. The bills of exception relate to such matters as depend for their soundness upon the facts. Having no facts before us we can not conclude same show any error. The indictment and charge of the court being regular, an affirmance will be ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinton v. State, 252 S.W. 525, 95 Tex. Crim. 3, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 487 (Tex. 1923).
252 S.W. 525 (Hinton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. State
55 S.W.2d 835 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Simpson v. State
10 S.W.2d 567 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Chisholm and Dyball v. State
1 S.W.2d 613 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)