Hinton v. State

252 S.W. 525, 95 Tex. Crim. 3, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 487
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 25, 1923
DocketNo. 7674.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 252 S.W. 525 (Hinton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinton v. State, 252 S.W. 525, 95 Tex. Crim. 3, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 487 (Tex. 1923).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the District Court Wichita County of receiving and concealing stolen property, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts. The bills of exception relate to such matters as depend for their soundness upon the facts. Having no facts before us we can not conclude same show any error. The indictment and charge of the court being regular, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. State
55 S.W.2d 835 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Simpson v. State
10 S.W.2d 567 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Chisholm and Dyball v. State
1 S.W.2d 613 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 S.W. 525, 95 Tex. Crim. 3, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinton-v-state-texcrimapp-1923.