Chisholm and Dyball v. State
1 S.W.2d 613, 108 Tex. Crim. 401, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 740
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 30, 1927·No. No. 11452.·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinions
The offense is assault with intent to murder; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.
The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without bills of exceptions or statement of facts. No fundamental error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chisholm and Dyball v. State, 1 S.W.2d 613, 108 Tex. Crim. 401, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 740 (Tex. 1927).
1 S.W.2d 613 (Chisholm and Dyball v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. State
148 S.W.2d 426 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Holland v. State
216 S.W.2d 228 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Castoria v. State
47 S.W.2d 325 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Black v. State
29 S.W.2d 755 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Gonzales v. State
23 S.W.2d 728 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Maguson v. State
21 S.W.2d 1052 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Leago v. State
13 S.W.2d 852 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Moore v. State
12 S.W.2d 805 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Preston v. State
12 S.W.2d 210 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Gilley v. State
13 S.W.2d 706 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
McKneely v. State
10 S.W.2d 544 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)