Hinton v. State

352 S.W.3d 680, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1530, 2011 WL 5553708
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 15, 2011·No. ED 96341·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Hinton (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished *681 with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hinton v. State, 352 S.W.3d 680, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1530, 2011 WL 5553708 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

352 S.W.3d 680 (Hinton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dean v. State
352 S.W.3d 680 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)