Dean v. State
352 S.W.3d 680, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1541, 2011 WL 5553704
Opinion
ORDER
Tavis Dean appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Dean’s request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dean v. State, 352 S.W.3d 680, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1541, 2011 WL 5553704 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
352 S.W.3d 680 (Dean v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hinton v. State
352 S.W.3d 680 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)