Hinton v. State

34 Mich. App. 663
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 28, 1971
DocketDocket No. 10021
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 Mich. App. 663 (Hinton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinton v. State, 34 Mich. App. 663 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff appeals from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of the defendants by the Court of Claims. Plaintiff filed an action against the defendants in that court alleging negligence on behalf of the state because of the state’s failure to keep deer from crossing the highway. The trial court ruled that the state was protected under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. We agree. See Myers v. Genesee County Auditor (1965), 375 Mich 1; Williams v. Primary School District #3, Green Township (1966), 3 Mich App 468; and Cody v. Southfield-Lathrup School District (1970), 25 Mich App 33.

Affirmed, costs to the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hinton v. State
192 N.W.2d 74 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Mich. App. 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinton-v-state-michctapp-1971.