Hinson v. Hooks

108 S.E. 822, 27 Ga. App. 430
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 7, 1921
Docket12243
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 108 S.E. 822 (Hinson v. Hooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinson v. Hooks, 108 S.E. 822, 27 Ga. App. 430 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

It is well settled that when a judge undertakes to charge the law upon any subject, he must charge all of it upon that subject that is material and applicable to the case. Rouse v. State, 2 Ga. App. 184 (58 S. E. 416); Harper v. State, 17 Ga. App. 561 (2) (106 S. E. 875). Upon the controlling issue in this case the plaintiff introduced a single witness and the defendant several witnesses. Therefore, when the court gave in charge to the jury a part of section 5732 of the Civil Code (1910), as to how the preponderance of evidence is determined, it was harmful error against the defendant to omit that part of the section which provides that “ the jury may also consider the number of witnesses, though the preponderance is not necessarily with the greater number.”

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Searles v. State
130 S.E.2d 253 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
School Boy Sportwear Corp. v. Cornelia Garment Co.
126 S.E.2d 248 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Green
106 S.E.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
State Highway Department v. Zimmerman
104 S.E.2d 702 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Andrus v. State Highway Department
93 S.E.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Cedrone v. Beck
40 S.E.2d 388 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Renfroe v. Hamilton
17 S.E.2d 709 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Powell v. Jarrell
16 S.E.2d 198 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Georgia Power Co. v. Burger
11 S.E.2d 834 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Tucker v. Talmadge
198 S.E. 726 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Travelers Insurance v. Anderson
184 S.E. 813 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Paramount Publix Corp.
182 S.E. 923 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Rogers v. McKinley
172 S.E. 662 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Awbrey v. Johnson
165 S.E. 846 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
George v. McCurdy
157 S.E. 219 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Clinton v. State
154 S.E. 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Jones v. Alred
153 S.E. 444 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Farmers State Bank v. Kelley
144 S.E. 258 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. McElroy
136 S.E. 85 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Brown v. Meikleham
128 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 822, 27 Ga. App. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinson-v-hooks-gactapp-1921.