Hines v. Beckner

7 S.E.2d 613, 61 Ga. App. 805, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 273
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 1, 1940·No. 27858, 27859.·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

In this case a nonsuit was awarded, and the only assignment of error in the main bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of a motion for new trial. Since a judgment of nonsuit can not be reviewed by a motion for new trial, the court did not err in overruling the motion. DeLoach v. Hicks, 54 Ga. App. 405 (187 S. E. 886). In view of this ruling, it is not necessary to consider the cross-bill of exceptions.

Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.

MacIntyre mid Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hines v. Beckner, 7 S.E.2d 613, 61 Ga. App. 805, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 273 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

7 S.E.2d 613 (Hines v. Beckner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeLoach v. Hicks
187 S.E. 886 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)