Hines v. Beckner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hines v. Beckner

7 S.E.2d 613, 61 Ga. App. 805, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 273

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 1, 1940

Docket27858, 27859.

StatusPublished

This text of 7 S.E.2d 613 (Hines v. Beckner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hines v. Beckner, 7 S.E.2d 613, 61 Ga. App. 805, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 273 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

In this case a nonsuit was awarded, and the only assignment of error in the main bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of a motion for new trial. Since a judgment of nonsuit can not be reviewed by a motion for new trial, the court did not err in overruling the motion. DeLoach v. Hicks, 54 Ga. App. 405 (187 S. E. 886). In view of this ruling, it is not necessary to consider the cross-bill of exceptions.

Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.

MacIntyre mid Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

In this case a nonsuit was awarded, and the only assignment of error in the main bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of a motion for new trial. Since a judgment of nonsuit can not be reviewed by a motion for new trial, the court did not err in overruling the motion. DeLoach v. Hicks, 54 Ga. App. 405 (187 S. E. 886). In view of this ruling, it is not necessary to consider the cross-bill of exceptions.

Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.

MacIntyre mid Guerry, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 S.E.2d 613, 61 Ga. App. 805, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-beckner-gactapp-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack