DeLoach v. Hicks

187 S.E. 886, 54 Ga. App. 405, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 599
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 23, 1936·No. 25693·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. A judgment of nonsuit is not a proper groxind of a motion for new trial, and can not be reviewed by this coux-t except on a direct bill of exceptions. Smith v. Perryman, 38 Ga. App. 496 (144 S. E. 341), and cit.; Hartsfield v. Kitchens, 51 Ga. App. 154 (179 S. E. 920).

2. In the instant case a nonsuit was awarded, and the bill of exceptions contains no assignment of error on that judgment; the only assignment •of error being on the overruling of the motion for new trial. Since the award of a nonsuit can not be reviewed by a motion for new trial, the court did not err in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeLoach v. Hicks, 187 S.E. 886, 54 Ga. App. 405, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 599 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

187 S.E. 886 (DeLoach v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamel v. Elliott
54 S.E.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Hines v. Beckner
7 S.E.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)