Hinely v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hinely v. State

57 S.E. 1021, 1 Ga. App. 518, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 23

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 28, 1907

Docket223

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 S.E. 1021 (Hinely v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinely v. State, 57 S.E. 1021, 1 Ga. App. 518, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 23 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

Where the trial court, by an order, set down the hearing of a motion for a new trial for a fixed date in vacation, thereby allowing the movant a reasonable time to prepare and present for approval a brief of the testimony, and on that date the brief had not been prepared, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to grant any further continuance of the motion and in dismissing the same. Penal Code, §966; Civil Code,-§5485.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

Where the trial court, by an order, set down the hearing of a motion for a new trial for a fixed date in vacation, thereby allowing the movant a reasonable time to prepare and present for approval a brief of the testimony, and on that date the brief had not been prepared, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to grant any further continuance of the motion and in dismissing the same. Penal Code, §966; Civil Code,-§5485.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 S.E. 1021, 1 Ga. App. 518, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinely-v-state-gactapp-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack