Hinely v. State
57 S.E. 1021, 1 Ga. App. 518, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 23
Opinion
Where the trial court, by an order, set down the hearing of a motion for a new trial for a fixed date in vacation, thereby allowing the movant a reasonable time to prepare and present for approval a brief of the testimony, and on that date the brief had not been prepared, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to grant any further continuance of the motion and in dismissing the same. Penal Code, §966; Civil Code,-§5485.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinely v. State, 57 S.E. 1021, 1 Ga. App. 518, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 23 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).
57 S.E. 1021 (Hinely v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bowden
64 S.E. 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)