Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bowden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bowden

64 S.E. 672, 6 Ga. App. 192, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 237

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 18, 1909

Docket1607

StatusPublished

This text of 64 S.E. 672 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bowden, 64 S.E. 672, 6 Ga. App. 192, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 237 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, O. J.

Where a motion for a new trial was filed in term, and the court set the hearing for a specified date and gave the movant until the final hearing to prepare and present his brief of evidence, and where, on the day specified, the motion was not heard, but was continued to a later date, and the movant was given until this latter date to prepare and present his brief of evidence, the dismissal of the motion for a new trial,, on the ground that the movant failed to prepare and present his brief of evidence on the date last named, was not error. Hinely v. State, 1 Ga. App. 518 (57 S. E. 1021); Brown v. Richards, 114 Ga. 318 (40 S. E. 224). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, O. J.

Where a motion for a new trial was filed in term, and the court set the hearing for a specified date and gave the movant until the final hearing to prepare and present his brief of evidence, and where, on the day specified, the motion was not heard, but was continued to a later date, and the movant was given until this latter date to prepare and present his brief of evidence, the dismissal of the motion for a new trial,, on the ground that the movant failed to prepare and present his brief of evidence on the date last named, was not error. Hinely v. State, 1 Ga. App. 518 (57 S. E. 1021); Brown v. Richards, 114 Ga. 318 (40 S. E. 224). Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 S.E. 672, 6 Ga. App. 192, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-bowden-gactapp-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack