Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bowden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bowden

64 S.E. 672, 6 Ga. App. 192, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 237

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 18, 1909·No. 1607·Published

Opinion

Hill, O. J.

Where a motion for a new trial was filed in term, and the court set the hearing for a specified date and gave the movant until the final hearing to prepare and present his brief of evidence, and where, on the day specified, the motion was not heard, but was continued to a later date, and the movant was given until this latter date to prepare and present his brief of evidence, the dismissal of the motion for a new trial,, on the ground that the movant failed to prepare and present his brief of evidence on the date last named, was not error. Hinely v. State, 1 Ga. App. 518 (57 S. E. 1021); Brown v. Richards, 114 Ga. 318 (40 S. E. 224). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, O. J.

Where a motion for a new trial was filed in term, and the court set the hearing for a specified date and gave the movant until the final hearing to prepare and present his brief of evidence, and where, on the day specified, the motion was not heard, but was continued to a later date, and the movant was given until this latter date to prepare and present his brief of evidence, the dismissal of the motion for a new trial,, on the ground that the movant failed to prepare and present his brief of evidence on the date last named, was not error. Hinely v. State, 1 Ga. App. 518 (57 S. E. 1021); Brown v. Richards, 114 Ga. 318 (40 S. E. 224). Judgment affirmed.

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bowden, 64 S.E. 672, 6 Ga. App. 192, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 237 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

64 S.E. 672 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Bowden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related