Hindus v. Newburger

105 N.E.2d 102, 303 N.Y. 872

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 13, 1952·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

303 N.Y. 872 (1952)

Minnie Hindus, Appellant,
v.
Lester M. Newburger et al., as Copartners, Defendants, and Florence Slutsky, Individually and as Executrix of Samuel Slutsky, Deceased, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 16, 1952. Decided March 13, 1952

Joseph S. Catalano and William J. Woods for appellant.

Douglas E. Mathewson and James A. Smyth for respondent.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

303 N.Y. 872 (1952)

Minnie Hindus, Appellant,
v.
Lester M. Newburger et al., as Copartners, Defendants, and Florence Slutsky, Individually and as Executrix of Samuel Slutsky, Deceased, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 16, 1952. Decided March 13, 1952

Joseph S. Catalano and William J. Woods for appellant.

Douglas E. Mathewson and James A. Smyth for respondent.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Hindus v. Newburger, 105 N.E.2d 102, 303 N.Y. 872 (N.Y. 1952).

Pincite

105 N.E.2d 102 (Hindus v. Newburger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

97 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Scheideler v. Scheideler

37 Misc. 2d 965 (New York County Courts, 1962)