Hindus v. Newburger
105 N.E.2d 102, 303 N.Y. 872
This text of 105 N.E.2d 102 (Hindus v. Newburger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hindus v. Newburger, 105 N.E.2d 102, 303 N.Y. 872 (N.Y. 1952).
Opinion
Minnie Hindus, Appellant,
v.
Lester M. Newburger et al., as Copartners, Defendants, and Florence Slutsky, Individually and as Executrix of Samuel Slutsky, Deceased, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Joseph S. Catalano and William J. Woods for appellant.
Douglas E. Mathewson and James A. Smyth for respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Maier
97 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Scheideler v. Scheideler
37 Misc. 2d 965 (New York County Courts, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
105 N.E.2d 102, 303 N.Y. 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hindus-v-newburger-ny-1952.