Hillstrom v. Best Western TLC

354 F.3d 27
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided January 23, 2004·No. 03-1972·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 03-1972

ROY HILLSTROM,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

BEST WESTERN TLC HOTEL,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on December 31, 2003 is amended as follows:

On page 2, line 3, "April 2002" should be replaced with "April 2000"

On page 8, after the colon on line 2, the portion of the sentence reading "usually the availability of a mixed-motive analysis depends" should be revised to read "the rule that usually the availability of a mixed-motive analysis depended"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hillstrom v. Best Western TLC, 354 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 2004).

354 F.3d 27 (Hillstrom v. Best Western TLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Currier v. United Technologies Corp.
393 F.3d 246 (First Circuit, 2004)
Fontanez-Nunez v. Janssen Ortho LLC
447 F.3d 50 (First Circuit, 2006)
Morón-Barradas v. Department of Education
488 F.3d 472 (First Circuit, 2007)
Sher v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
488 F.3d 489 (First Circuit, 2007)
Chadwick v. WellPoint, Inc.
561 F.3d 38 (First Circuit, 2009)
Velazquez-Ortiz v. Vilsack
657 F.3d 64 (First Circuit, 2011)