Hillstrom v. Best Western TLC

First Circuit

Hillstrom v. Best Western TLC

354 F.3d 27

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 2004

Docket03-1972

StatusPublished

This text of 354 F.3d 27 (Hillstrom v. Best Western TLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hillstrom v. Best Western TLC, 354 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 03-1972

ROY HILLSTROM,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

BEST WESTERN TLC HOTEL,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on December 31, 2003 is amended as follows:

On page 2, line 3, "April 2002" should be replaced with "April 2000"

On page 8, after the colon on line 2, the portion of the sentence reading "usually the availability of a mixed-motive analysis depends" should be revised to read "the rule that usually the availability of a mixed-motive analysis depended"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI