Hillside Housing Corp. v. Local 32E, Building Service Employees International Union

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hillside Housing Corp. v. Local 32E, Building Service Employees International Union

40 A.D.2d 795, 338 N.Y.S.2d 95, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2751, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3331

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 1972·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 17, 1972, unanimously modified, on the law, to add the further provision that the award of the arbitrator be and it hereby is confirmed, and judgment otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We agree that Special Term correctly concluded that the arbitrator did not exceed his powers and that the award is adequate as to form and content. The arbitrator was not required to state the reasons or grounds for his determination of the issues submitted (see Korein v. Rabin, 29 A D 2d 351; Matter of Bay Ridge Med. Group v. Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Y., 22 A D 2d 807). However, on denial of the motion to vacate or modify the award, the court should have confirmed the award (see CPLR 7511, subd. [e]). Concur—Nunez, J. P., McNally, Tilzer, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 17, 1972, unanimously modified, on the law, to add the further provision that the award of the arbitrator be and it hereby is confirmed, and judgment otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We agree that Special Term correctly concluded that the arbitrator did not exceed his powers and that the award is adequate as to form and content. The arbitrator was not required to state the reasons or grounds for his determination of the issues submitted (see Korein v. Rabin, 29 A D 2d 351; Matter of Bay Ridge Med. Group v. Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Y., 22 A D 2d 807). However, on denial of the motion to vacate or modify the award, the court should have confirmed the award (see CPLR 7511, subd. [e]). Concur—Nunez, J. P., McNally, Tilzer, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.

Hillside Housing Corp. v. Local 32E, Building Service Employees International Union, 40 A.D.2d 795, 338 N.Y.S.2d 95, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2751, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

40 A.D.2d 795 (Hillside Housing Corp. v. Local 32E, Building Service Employees International Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related