Board of Education v. Ardsley Congress of Teachers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Education v. Ardsley Congress of Teachers

48 A.D.2d 879, 369 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10123

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding to vacate an arbitration award, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 18, 1975, which denied appellant’s motion for resettlement of a prior order of the same court, dated September 11, 1974, which prior order denied petitioner’s motion to vacate the award. Order reversed, without costs, motion for resettlement granted, and the prior order is resettled by adding thereto a further decretal provision to the effect that the arbitration award is confirmed. Upon the denial of petitioner’s motion to vacate the arbitration award, Special Term should have confirmed the award (CPLR 7511, subd [e]; Matter of Hillside Housing Corp. v Local 32E, Bldg. Serv. Employees Int. Union, 40 AD2d 795). We note, however, that we have not considered the merits of the prior order as petitioner’s appeal therefrom remains unperfected. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to vacate an arbitration award, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 18, 1975, which denied appellant’s motion for resettlement of a prior order of the same court, dated September 11, 1974, which prior order denied petitioner’s motion to vacate the award. Order reversed, without costs, motion for resettlement granted, and the prior order is resettled by adding thereto a further decretal provision to the effect that the arbitration award is confirmed. Upon the denial of petitioner’s motion to vacate the arbitration award, Special Term should have confirmed the award (CPLR 7511, subd [e]; Matter of Hillside Housing Corp. v Local 32E, Bldg. Serv. Employees Int. Union, 40 AD2d 795). We note, however, that we have not considered the merits of the prior order as petitioner’s appeal therefrom remains unperfected. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Christ, JJ., concur.

Board of Education v. Ardsley Congress of Teachers, 48 A.D.2d 879, 369 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

48 A.D.2d 879 (Board of Education v. Ardsley Congress of Teachers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related