Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hillman v. Eick

Hillman v. Eick

8 A.D.3d 991, 778 N.Y.S.2d 355
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 14, 2004
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.3d 991 (Hillman v. Eick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hillman v. Eick, 8 A.D.3d 991, 778 N.Y.S.2d 355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal from an [992]*992amended order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered May 29, 2002. The amended order clarified the order, entered May 22, 2002, by providing that plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment was granted on negligence rather than on liability.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hillman v Eick ([appeal No. 1] 8 AD3d 989 [2004]). Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hillman v. Eick
8 A.D.3d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.3d 991, 778 N.Y.S.2d 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillman-v-eick-nyappdiv-2004.