Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
805 A.2d 509, 569 Pa. 491, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1757
Opinions
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2002, the Commonwealth Court’s order is vacated and the matter remanded for reconsideration in light of Vista Int’l Hotel v. WCAB (Daniels), 560 Pa. 12, 742 A.2d 649 (1999). See generally Montgomery Hosp. v. WCAB (Armstrong), 793 A.2d 182, 189 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002); Darrall v. WCAB (H.J. Heinz Co.), 792 A.2d 706, 712-13 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002); Martin v. WCAB (Red [510] Rose Transit Auth), 783 A.2d 384, 391 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001).
Madame Justice NEWMAN files a concurring statement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 805 A.2d 509, 569 Pa. 491, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1757 (Pa. 2002).
805 A.2d 509 (Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll)
824 A.2d 358 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Berks County Courthouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
809 A.2d 900 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)