Hill v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7630
RODNEY HILL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; D. BLAKNEY, (Ms.) Supervisor of Education; J. BOLYAR, (Mr.) Associate Warden; P. BULTER, (Ms.) Unit Manager,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. John S. Kaull, Magistrate Judge. (5:09-cv-00019-FPS-JSK)
Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Rodney Hill seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
entry of an order pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309
(4th Cir. 1975), notifying Hill of the need to respond to a
summary judgment motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Hill seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. United States (Hill v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.