Hill v. United States

385 F. App'x 351
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2010·No. No. 09-7630·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Hill seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s entry of an order pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir.1975), notifying Hill of the need to respond to a summary judgment motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-16, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Hill seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. United States, 385 F. App'x 351 (4th Cir. 2010).

385 F. App'x 351 (Hill v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related