Hill v. State

91 S.W.2d 348
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Tex. Crim. 567
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 12, 1936·No. No. 17967·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed. See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 91 S.W.2d 348 (Tex. 1936).

91 S.W.2d 348 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)