Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hill v. State

67 S.W.2d 278, 125 Tex. Crim. 147, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 16

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Tex. Crim. 585 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 10, 1934·No. No. 16325.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for theft; punishment, seven and one-half years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record an affidavit in due form made by the ¡district attorney certifying that pending this appeal the appellant has made his escape and is now a fugitive from justice. 'Under the provisions of our law this court is without further 'jurisdiction in such case, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for theft; punishment, seven and one-half years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record an affidavit in due form made by the ¡district attorney certifying that pending this appeal the appellant has made his escape and is now a fugitive from justice. 'Under the provisions of our law this court is without further 'jurisdiction in such case, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

Hill v. State, 67 S.W.2d 278, 125 Tex. Crim. 147, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 16 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

67 S.W.2d 278 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.