Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hill v. State

Hill v. State

136 S.E. 112, 36 Ga. App. 92, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 781
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Ga. App. 699 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 9, 1926·No. 17535·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant’s conviction of possessing intoxicating liquor was amply supported by the evidence, and, no error of law being shown, the trial judge properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 136 S.E. 112, 36 Ga. App. 92, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 781 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

136 S.E. 112 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.